الموت الرحيم

(تم التحويل من Euthanasia)
هذا المقال هو عن euthanasia of humans. إذا كنت تريد humane killings of other animals، انظر Animal euthanasia. إذا كنت تريد the killing of mortally wounded animals or humans، انظر Coup de grâce. إذا كنت تريد the Megadeth album، انظر Youthanasia.
جزء من سلسلة عن
الموت الرحيم
الأنواع
الآراء
الجماعات
أشخاص
كتب
المناطق
القوانين
البدائل
قضايا أخرى
جزء من سلسلة مقالات عن
القتل
قتل

ملاحظة: يختلف حسب الولاية القضائية

قتل غير متعمد
قتل غير جنائي

ملاحظة: يختلف حسب الولاية القضائية

بواسطة ضحية أو ضحايا
العائلة
أخرى

القتل الرحيم Euthanasia هو إنهاء حياة شخص بدون ألم، بسبب الإصابة بأمراض مستعصية وبآلام لا تحتمل لا أمل من الشفاء منها.[1][2]

Different countries have different euthanasia laws. The British House of Lords select committee on medical ethics defines euthanasia as "a deliberate intervention undertaken with the express intention of ending a life to relieve intractable suffering".[3] وهو فعل مجرم في معظم دول العالم ماعدا هولندا التي أباحته في إبريل 2002 وبلجيكا أباحته في سبتمبر 2002.

التعريف

الاستخدام الحالي

As of 2024, dictionary definitions focus on euthanasia as the act of killing someone to prevent further suffering. There is no sense of whether the person agrees or is proactive in the situation.[4][5]

من وجهة النظر الدينية

يحرم الإسلام والمسيحية واليهودية الموت الرجيم لأن الحياة ليست ملك الإنسان حتى يتصرف فيها ولكنها ملك لله

التبويب

Euthanasia may be classified into three types, according to whether a person gives informed consent: voluntary, non-voluntary and involuntary.[6][7]

There is a debate within the medical and bioethics literature about whether or not the non-voluntary (and by extension, involuntary) killing of patients can be regarded as euthanasia, irrespective of intent or the patient's circumstances. In the definitions offered by Beauchamp and Davidson and, later, by Wreen, consent on the part of the patient was not considered one of their criteria, although it may have been required to justify euthanasia.[8][9] However, others see consent as essential.

الموت الرحيم التطوعي

انظر أيضاً: حق الموت

Voluntary euthanasia is conducted with the consent of the patient.[10] Active voluntary euthanasia is legal in Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. Passive voluntary euthanasia is legal throughout the US per Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. When the patient brings about their own death with the assistance of a physician, the term assisted suicide is often used instead. Assisted suicide is legal in Switzerland and the U.S. states of California, Oregon, Washington, Montana and Vermont.

Non-voluntary euthanasia

Non-voluntary euthanasia is conducted when the consent of the patient is unavailable.[10] Examples include child euthanasia, which is illegal worldwide but decriminalised under certain specific circumstances in the Netherlands under the Groningen Protocol. Passive forms of non-voluntary euthanasia (i.e. withholding treatment) are legal in a number of countries under specified conditions.

Involuntary euthanasia

Involuntary euthanasia is done without asking for consent or against the patient's will.[10] It is considered murder and is illegal in all countries.

Passive and active euthanasia

Voluntary, non-voluntary and involuntary types can be further divided into passive or active variants.[11] Passive euthanasia entails the withholding treatment necessary for the continuance of life.[3] Active euthanasia entails the use of lethal substances or forces (such as administering a lethal injection), and is more controversial. While some authors consider these terms to be misleading and unhelpful, they are nonetheless commonly used. In some cases, such as the administration of increasingly necessary, but toxic doses of painkillers, there is a debate whether or not to regard the practice as active or passive.[3]

التاريخ

The Death of Socrates، بريشة جاك-لوي داڤيد (1787)، depicting Socrates prepared to drink hemlock، إثر إدانته بإفساد شباب أثينا

Euthanasia was practiced in Ancient Greece and Rome: for example, hemlock was employed as a means of hastening death on the island of Kea, a technique also employed in Massalia. Euthanasia, in the sense of the deliberate hastening of a person's death, was supported by Socrates, Plato and Seneca the Elder in the ancient world, although Hippocrates appears to have spoken against the practice, writing "I will not prescribe a deadly drug to please someone, nor give advice that may cause his death" (noting there is some debate in the literature about whether or not this was intended to encompass euthanasia).[12][13][14]

العصر الحديث المبكر

The term euthanasia, in the earlier sense of supporting someone as they died, was used for the first time by Francis Bacon. In his work, Euthanasia medica, he chose this ancient Greek word and, in doing so, distinguished between euthanasia interior, the preparation of the soul for death, and euthanasia exterior, which was intended to make the end of life easier and painless, in exceptional circumstances by shortening life. That the ancient meaning of an easy death came to the fore again in the early modern period can be seen from its definition in the 18th century Zedlers Universallexikon:

Euthanasia: a very gentle and quiet death, which happens without painful convulsions. The word comes from ευ, bene, well, and θανατος, mors, death.[15]

The concept of euthanasia in the sense of alleviating the process of death goes back to the medical historian Karl Friedrich Heinrich Marx, who drew on Bacon's philosophical ideas. According to Marx, a doctor had a moral duty to ease the suffering of death through encouragement, support and mitigation using medication. Such an "alleviation of death" reflected the contemporary zeitgeist, but was brought into the medical canon of responsibility for the first time by Marx. Marx also stressed the distinction of the theological care of the soul of sick people from the physical care and medical treatment by doctors.[16][17]

Euthanasia in its modern sense has always been strongly opposed in the Christian tradition. Thomas Aquinas opposed both and argued that the practice of euthanasia contradicted our natural human instincts of survival,[18] as did Francois Ranchin (1565–1641), a French physician and professor of medicine, and Michael Boudewijns (1601–1681), a physician and teacher.[13]:208[14] Other voices argued for euthanasia, such as John Donne in 1624,[19] and euthanasia continued to be practised. In 1678, the publication of Caspar Questel's De pulvinari morientibus non-subtrahend, ("On the pillow of which the dying should not be deprived"), initiated debate on the topic. Questel described various customs which were employed at the time to hasten the death of the dying, (including the sudden removal of a pillow, which was believed to accelerate death), and argued against their use, as doing so was "against the laws of God and Nature".[13]:209–211 This view was shared by others who followed, including Philipp Jakob Spener, Veit Riedlin and Johann Georg Krünitz.[13]:211 Despite opposition, euthanasia continued to be practised, involving techniques such as bleeding, suffocation, and removing people from their beds to be placed on the cold ground.[13]:211–214

Suicide and euthanasia became more accepted during the Age of Enlightenment.[14] Thomas More wrote of euthanasia in Utopia, although it is not clear if More was intending to endorse the practice.[13]:208–209 Other cultures have taken different approaches: for example, in Japan suicide has not traditionally been viewed as a sin, as it is used in cases of honor, and accordingly, the perceptions of euthanasia are different from those in other parts of the world.[20]

Beginnings of the contemporary euthanasia debate

In the mid-1800s, the use of morphine to treat "the pains of death" emerged, with John Warren recommending its use in 1848. A similar use of chloroform was revealed by Joseph Bullar in 1866. However, in neither case was it recommended that the use should be to hasten death. In 1870 Samuel Williams, a schoolteacher, initiated the contemporary euthanasia debate through a speech given at the Birmingham Speculative Club in England, which was subsequently published in a one-off publication entitled Essays of the Birmingham Speculative Club, the collected works of a number of members of an amateur philosophical society.[21]:794 Williams' proposal was to use chloroform to deliberately hasten the death of terminally ill patients:

That in all cases of hopeless and painful illness, it should be the recognized duty of the medical attendant, whenever so desired by the patient, to administer chloroform or such other anaesthetic as may by-and-bye supersede chloroform – so as to destroy consciousness at once, and put the sufferer to a quick and painless death; all needful precautions being adopted to prevent any possible abuse of such duty; and means being taken to establish, beyond the possibility of doubt or question, that the remedy was applied at the express wish of the patient.

— Samuel Williams (1872)، Euthanasia Williams and Northgate: London.[21]:794

The essay was favourably reviewed in The Saturday Review, but an editorial against the essay appeared in The Spectator.[22] From there it proved to be influential, and other writers came out in support of such views: Lionel Tollemache wrote in favour of euthanasia, as did Annie Besant, the essayist and reformer who later became involved with the National Secular Society, considering it a duty to society to "die voluntarily and painlessly" when one reaches the point of becoming a 'burden'.[22][23] Popular Science analysed the issue in May 1873, assessing both sides of the argument.[24] Kemp notes that at the time, medical doctors did not participate in the discussion; it was "essentially a philosophical enterprise ... tied inextricably to a number of objections to the Christian doctrine of the sanctity of human life".[22]

Early euthanasia movement in the United States

المقالة الرئيسية: Euthanasia in the United States
Felix Adler, 1913ح. 1913, the first prominent American to argue for permitting suicide in cases of chronic illness

The rise of the euthanasia movement in the United States coincided with the so-called Gilded Age, a time of social and technological change that encompassed an "individualistic conservatism that praised laissez-faire economics, scientific method, and rationalism", along with major depressions, industrialisation and conflict between corporations and labour unions.[21]:794 It was also the period in which the modern hospital system was developed, which has been seen as a factor in the emergence of the euthanasia debate.[25]

Robert Ingersoll argued for euthanasia, stating in 1894 that where someone is suffering from a terminal illness, such as terminal cancer, they should have a right to end their pain through suicide. Felix Adler offered a similar approach, although, unlike Ingersoll, Adler did not reject religion. In fact, he argued from an Ethical Culture framework. In 1891, Adler argued that those suffering from overwhelming pain should have the right to commit suicide, and, furthermore, that it should be permissible for a doctor to assist – thus making Adler the first "prominent American" to argue for suicide in cases where people were suffering from chronic illness.[26] Both Ingersoll and Adler argued for voluntary euthanasia of adults suffering from terminal ailments.[26] Dowbiggin argues that by breaking down prior moral objections to euthanasia and suicide, Ingersoll and Adler enabled others to stretch the definition of euthanasia.[27]

The first attempt to legalise euthanasia took place in the United States, when Henry Hunt introduced legislation into the General Assembly of Ohio in 1906.[28]:614 Hunt did so at the behest of Anna Sophina Hall, a wealthy heiress who was a major figure in the euthanasia movement during the early 20th century in the United States. Hall had watched her mother die after an extended battle with liver cancer, and had dedicated herself to ensuring that others would not have to endure the same suffering. Towards this end she engaged in an extensive letter writing campaign, recruited Lurana Sheldon and Maud Ballington Booth, and organised a debate on euthanasia at the annual meeting of the American Humane Association in 1905 – described by Jacob Appel as the first significant public debate on the topic in the 20th century.[28]:614–616

Hunt's bill called for the administration of an anesthetic to bring about a patient's death, so long as the person is of lawful age and sound mind, and was suffering from a fatal injury, an irrevocable illness, or great physical pain. It also required that the case be heard by a physician, required informed consent in front of three witnesses, and required the attendance of three physicians who had to agree that the patient's recovery was impossible. A motion to reject the bill outright was voted down, but the bill failed to pass, 79 to 23.[21]:796[28]:618–619

Along with the Ohio euthanasia proposal, in 1906 Assemblyman Ross Gregory introduced a proposal to permit euthanasia to the Iowa legislature. However, the Iowa legislation was broader in scope than that offered in Ohio. It allowed for the death of any person of at least ten years of age who suffered from an ailment that would prove fatal and cause extreme pain, should they be of sound mind and express a desire to artificially hasten their death. In addition, it allowed for infants to be euthanised if they were sufficiently deformed, and permitted guardians to request euthanasia on behalf of their wards. The proposed legislation also imposed penalties on physicians who refused to perform euthanasia when requested: a 6–12-month prison term and a fine of between $200 and $1,000. The proposal proved to be controversial.[28]:619–621 It engendered considerable debate and failed to pass, having been withdrawn from consideration after being passed to the Committee on Public Health.[28]:623

After 1906 the euthanasia debate reduced in intensity, resurfacing periodically, but not returning to the same level of debate until the 1930s in the United Kingdom.[21]:796

Euthanasia opponent Ian Dowbiggin argues that the early membership of the Euthanasia Society of America (ESA) reflected how many perceived euthanasia at the time, often seeing it as a eugenics matter rather than an issue concerning individual rights.[26] Dowbiggin argues that not every eugenist joined the ESA "solely for eugenic reasons", but he postulates that there were clear ideological connections between the eugenics and euthanasia movements.[26]

1930s in Britain

The Voluntary Euthanasia Legalisation Society was founded in 1935 by Charles Killick Millard (now called Dignity in Dying). The movement campaigned for the legalisation of euthanasia in Great Britain.

In January 1936, King George V was given a fatal dose of morphine and cocaine to hasten his death. At the time he was suffering from cardio-respiratory failure, and the decision to end his life was made by his physician, Lord Dawson.[29] Although this event was kept a secret for over 50 years, the death of George V coincided with proposed legislation in the House of Lords to legalise euthanasia.[30]

Nazi Euthanasia Program

المقالة الرئيسية: Aktion T4 and Child euthanasia in Nazi Germany
ملف:Alkoven Schloss Hartheim 2005-08-18 3589.jpg
Hartheim Euthanasia Centre, where over 18,000 people were killed

A 24 July 1939 killing of a severely disabled infant in Nazi Germany was described in a BBC "Genocide Under the Nazis Timeline" as the first "state-sponsored euthanasia".[31] Parties that consented to the killing included Hitler's office, the parents, and the Reich Committee for the Scientific Registration of Serious and Congenitally Based Illnesses.[31] The Telegraph noted that the killing of the disabled infant—whose name was Gerhard Kretschmar, born blind, with missing limbs, subject to convulsions, and reportedly "an idiot"— provided "the rationale for a secret Nazi decree that led to 'mercy killings' of almost 300,000 mentally and physically handicapped people".[32] While Kretchmar's killing received parental consent, most of the 5,000 to 8,000 children killed afterwards were forcibly taken from their parents.[31][32]

The "euthanasia campaign" gathered momentum on 14 January 1940 when the "handicapped" were killed with gas vans and at killing centres, eventually leading to the deaths of 70,000 adult Germans.[33] Its code name Aktion T4 is derived from Tiergartenstraße 4, a street address of the Chancellery department which recruited and paid personnel associated with the program.[32] Professor Robert Jay Lifton, author of The Nazi Doctors and a leading authority on the T4 program, contrasts this program with what he considers to be a genuine euthanasia. He explains that the Nazi version of "euthanasia" was based on the work of Adolf Jost, who published The Right to Death (Das Recht auf den Tod) in 1895. Lifton writes:

Jost argued that control over the death of the individual must ultimately belong to the social organism, the state. This concept is in direct opposition to the Anglo-American concept of euthanasia, which emphasizes the individual's 'right to die' or 'right to death' or 'right to his or her own death,' as the ultimate human claim. In contrast, Jost was pointing to the state's right to kill. ... Ultimately the argument was biological: 'The rights to death [are] the key to the fitness of life.' The state must own death—must kill—in order to keep the social organism alive and healthy.[34]

In modern terms, the use of "euthanasia" in the context of Aktion T4 is seen to be a euphemism to disguise a program of genocide, in which people were killed on the grounds of "disabilities, religious beliefs, and discordant individual values".[35] Compared to the discussions of euthanasia that emerged post-war, the Nazi program may have been worded in terms that appear similar to the modern use of "euthanasia", but there was no "mercy" and the patients were not necessarily terminally ill.[35] Despite these differences, historian and euthanasia opponent Ian Dowbiggin writes that "the origins of Nazi euthanasia, like those of the American euthanasia movement, predate the Third Reich and were intertwined with the history of eugenics and Social Darwinism, and with efforts to discredit traditional morality and ethics."[26]:65

1949 New York State Petition for Euthanasia and Catholic opposition

On 6 January 1949, the Euthanasia Society of America presented to the New York State Legislature a petition to legalize euthanasia, signed by 379 leading Protestant and Jewish ministers, the largest group of religious leaders ever to have taken this stance. A similar petition had been sent to the New York Legislature in 1947, signed by approximately 1,000 New York physicians. Roman Catholic religious leaders criticized the petition, saying that such a bill would "legalize a suicide-murder pact" and a "rationalization of the fifth commandment of God, 'Thou Shalt Not Kill.'"[36] The Right Reverend Robert E. McCormick stated that:

The ultimate object of the Euthanasia Society is based on the Totalitarian principle that the state is supreme and that the individual does not have the right to live if his continuance in life is a burden or hindrance to the state. The Nazis followed this principle and compulsory Euthanasia was practiced as a part of their program during the recent war. We American citizens of New York State must ask ourselves this question: "Are we going to finish Hitler's job?"[36]

The petition brought tensions between the American Euthanasia Society and the Catholic Church to a head that contributed to a climate of anti-Catholic sentiment generally, regarding issues such as birth control, eugenics, and population control. However, the petition did not result in any legal changes.[26]

الوضع القانوني

المقالة الرئيسية: Legality of euthanasia
Current status of euthanasia around the world:
  Active voluntary euthanasia legal (Belgium, Canada, Colombia, Ecuador, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Portugal,[note 1] Spain, Uruguay and the Australian states of New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria and Western Australia)
  Passive euthanasia legal (refusal of treatment / withdrawal of life support)
  Active euthanasia illegal, passive euthanasia not legislated or regulated
  All forms of euthanasia illegal
ملف:1998- EAS euthanasia and assisted suicide - by country or state.svg
Rates of euthanasia and assisted suicide (EAS) have increased substantially in developed countries, with wide variance in the rates of increase.[39]

Eligibility for euthanasia varies across jurisdictions where it is legal.[40] Some countries, such as Belgium and the Netherlands, allow euthanasia for mental illness.[41]

West's Encyclopedia of American Law states that "a 'mercy killing' or euthanasia is generally considered to be a criminal homicide" and is normally used as a synonym of homicide committed at a request made by the patient.[42][43]

The judicial sense of the term homicide includes any intervention undertaken with the express intention of ending a life, even to relieve intractable suffering.[44][43][45] Not all homicide is unlawful.[46] Two designations of homicide that carry no criminal punishment are justifiable and excusable homicide.[46] In most countries this is not the status of euthanasia. The term euthanasia is usually confined to the active variety; the University of Washington website states that "euthanasia generally means that the physician would act directly, for instance by giving a lethal injection, to end the patient's life".[47] Physician-assisted suicide is thus not classified as euthanasia by the US State of Oregon, where it is legal under the Oregon Death with Dignity Act, and despite its name, it is not legally classified as suicide either.[48] Unlike physician-assisted suicide, withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments with patient consent (voluntary) is almost unanimously considered, at least in the United States, to be legal.[49] The use of pain medication to relieve suffering, even if it hastens death, has been held as legal in several court decisions.[47]

Some governments around the world have legalized voluntary euthanasia but most commonly it is still considered to be criminal homicide. In the Netherlands and Belgium, where euthanasia has been legalized, it still remains homicide although it is not prosecuted and not punishable if the perpetrator (the doctor) meets certain legal conditions.[50][51][52][53]

In a historic judgment, the Supreme Court of India legalized passive euthanasia. The apex court remarked in the judgment that the Constitution of India values liberty, dignity, autonomy, and privacy. A bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra delivered a unanimous judgment.[54] Common Cause (India) was the main petitioner in the case, filed in 2005.[55]


انظر أيضاً

المراجع

  1. ^ Kuhse, Helga. "Euthanasia Fact Sheet". The World Federation of Right to Die Societies. Archived from the original on 5 August 2017. Retrieved 6 July 2017. 'Euthanasia' is a compound of two Greek words – eu and thanatos meaning, literally, 'a good death'. Today, 'euthanasia' is generally understood to mean the bringing about of a good death – 'mercy killing,' where one person, A, ends the life of another person, B, for the sake of B."
  2. ^ "Voluntary Euthanasia". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on Jun 11, 2019. Retrieved 7 May 2019. When a person performs an act of euthanasia, she brings about the death of another person because she believes the latter's present existence is so bad that he would be better off dead, or believes that unless she intervenes and ends his life, his life will very soon become so bad that he would be better off dead.
  3. ^ أ ب ت Harris, NM. (October 2001). "The euthanasia debate". J R Army Med Corps. 147 (3): 367–70. doi:10.1136/jramc-147-03-22. PMID 11766225.
  4. ^ "Dictionary.com | Meanings & Definitions of English Words". Dictionary.com.
  5. ^ "Euthanasia". Dictionary.cambridge.org. 27 May 2026. Retrieved 31 May 2026.
  6. ^ Perrett RW (October 1996). "Buddhism, euthanasia and the sanctity of life". J Med Ethics. 22 (5): 309–13. doi:10.1136/jme.22.5.309. PMC 1377066. PMID 8910785.
  7. ^ LaFollette, Hugh (2002). Ethics in practice: an anthology. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 25–26. ISBN 978-0-631-22834-9.
  8. ^ خطأ استشهاد: وسم <ref> غير صحيح؛ لا نص تم توفيره للمراجع المسماة BeauchampDavidson1979
  9. ^ Wreen, Michael (1988). "The Definition of Euthanasia". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 48 (4): 637–53. doi:10.2307/2108012. JSTOR 2108012. PMID 11652547.
  10. ^ أ ب ت Jackson, Jennifer (2006). Ethics in medicine. Polity. p. 137. ISBN 0-7456-2569-X.
  11. ^ Rachels J (January 1975). "Active and passive euthanasia". N. Engl. J. Med. 292 (2): 78–80. doi:10.1056/NEJM197501092920206. PMID 1109443. S2CID 46465710.
  12. ^ Mystakidou, Kyriaki; Parpa, Efi; Tsilika, Eleni; Katsouda, Emanuela; Vlahos, Lambros (2005). "The Evolution of Euthanasia and Its Perceptions in Greek Culture and Civilization". Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. 48 (1): 97–98. doi:10.1353/pbm.2005.0013. PMID 15681882. S2CID 44600176.
  13. ^ أ ب ت ث ج ح Stolberg, Michael (2007). "Active Euthanasia in Pre-ModernSociety, 1500–1800: Learned Debates and Popular Practices". Social History of Medicine. 20 (2): 206–07. doi:10.1093/shm/hkm034. PMID 18605325. S2CID 6150428.
  14. ^ أ ب ت Gesundheit, Benjamin; Steinberg, Avraham; Glick, Shimon; Or, Reuven; Jotkovitz, Alan (2006). "Euthanasia: An Overview and the Jewish Perspective". Cancer Investigation. 24 (6): 621–9. doi:10.1080/07357900600894898. PMID 16982468. S2CID 8906449.
  15. ^ Zedlers Universallexikon, Vol. 08, p. 1150, published 1732–54.
  16. ^ Markwart Michler: Marx, Karl, Mediziner. In: Neue Deutsche Biographie (NDB). Bd. 16, Berlin 1990, S. 327–328.
  17. ^ Helge Dvorak: Biographisches Lexikon der Deutschen Burschenschaft. Vol. I, Sub-vol. 4, Heidelberg, 2000, pp. 40–41.
  18. ^ "Historical Timeline: History of Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide," Archived 5 يوليو 2012 at the Library of Congress Web Archives Euthanasia – ProCon.org. Last updated on: 23 July 2013. Retrieved 4 May 2014.
  19. ^ Mannes, Marya (1975). "Euthanasia vs. the Right to Life". Baylor Law Review. 27: 69.
  20. ^ Otani, Izumi (2010). ""Good Manner of Dying" as a Normative Concept: "Autocide", "Granny Dumping" and Discussions on Euthanasia/Death with Dignity in Japan". International Journal of Japanese Sociology. 19 (1): 49–63. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6781.2010.01136.x.
  21. ^ أ ب ت ث ج Emanuel, Ezekiel (1994). "The history of euthanasia debates in the United States and Britain". Annals of Internal Medicine. 121 (10): 796. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.732.724. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-121-10-199411150-00010. PMID 7944057. S2CID 20754659.
  22. ^ أ ب ت Nick Kemp (7 September 2002). Merciful Release. Manchester University Press. ISBN 978-0-7190-6124-0. OL 10531689M. 0719061245.
  23. ^ Ian Dowbiggin (March 2007). A Concise History of Euthanasia: Life, Death, God, and Medicine. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 51, 62–64. ISBN 978-0-7425-3111-6.
  24. ^ "Euthanasia". Popular Science. May 1873.
  25. ^ Pappas, Demetra (1996). "Recent historical perspectives regarding medical euthanasia and physician assisted suicide". British Medical Bulletin. 52 (2): 386–87. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a011554. PMID 8759237.
  26. ^ أ ب ت ث ج ح Dowbiggin, Ian (2003). A merciful end: the euthanasia movement in modern America. Oxford University Press. pp. 10–13. ISBN 978-0-19-515443-6.
  27. ^ Dowbiggin, Ian (2003). A merciful end: the euthanasia movement in modern America. Oxford University Press. p. 13. ISBN 978-0-19-515443-6.
  28. ^ أ ب ت ث ج Appel, Jacob (2004). "A Duty to Kill? A Duty to Die? Rethinking the Euthanasia Controversy of 1906". Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 78 (3): 610–34. doi:10.1353/bhm.2004.0106. PMID 15356372. S2CID 24991992.
  29. ^ Ramsay, J H R (28 May 2011). "A king, a doctor, and a convenient death". British Medical Journal. 308 (1445): 1445. doi:10.1136/bmj.308.6941.1445. PMC 2540387. PMID 11644545.
  30. ^ Gurney, Edward (1972). "Is There a Right to Die – A Study of the Law of Euthanasia". Cumberland-Samford Law Review. 3: 237.
  31. ^ أ ب ت Genocide Under the Nazis Timeline: 24 July 1939 Archived 5 أغسطس 2011 at the Wayback Machine BBC Accessed 23 July 2011. Quotation: "The first state-sanctioned euthanasia is carried out, after Hitler receives a petition from a child's parents, asking for the life of their severely disabled infant to be ended. This happens after the case has been considered by Hitler's office and by the Reich Committee for the Scientific Registration of Serious and Congenitally Based Illnesses, whose 'experts' have laid down the basis for the removal of disabled children to special 'paediatric clinics'. Here they can be either starved to death or given lethal injections. At least 5,200 infants will eventually be killed through this programme".
  32. ^ أ ب ت Irene Zoech (11 October 2003). "Named: the baby boy who was Nazis' first euthanasia victim". Telegraph.co.uk. Archived from the original on 8 September 2017. Retrieved 4 July 2017.
  33. ^ Genocide Under the Nazis Timeline: 14 January 1940 Archived 5 أغسطس 2011 at the Wayback Machine BBC Accessed 23 July 2011. Quotation: "The 'euthanasia campaign' gathers momentum in Germany, as six special killing centres and gas vans, under an organisation code-named T4, are used in the murder of 'handicapped' adults. Over 70,000 Germans will eventually be killed in this act of mass murder – it is the first time poison bas will be used for such a purpose".
  34. ^ Basic Books 1986, 46
  35. ^ أ ب Michalsen A, Reinhart K (September 2006). ""Euthanasia": A confusing term, abused under the Nazi regime and misused in present end-of-life debate". Intensive Care Med. 32 (9): 1304–10. doi:10.1007/s00134-006-0256-9. PMID 16826394. S2CID 21032497.
  36. ^ أ ب The Moncton Transcript. "Ministers Ask Mercy Killing." 6 January 1949.
  37. ^ "Law n.º 22/2023, of 22 May, published on the 1st Series of Diário da República, n.º 101, of 25 May 2023, in Portuguese, retrieved 25 May 2023". Retrieved 31 May 2026.
  38. ^ Caeiro, Tiago (24 November 2023). "Eutanásia não avança para já. Ministério da Saúde deixa regulamentação para o próximo governo" [Euthanasia is not moving forward for now. Ministry of Health leaves regulation to the next government]. Observador (in Portuguese). Archived from the original on 2 December 2023. Retrieved 14 January 2024.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
  39. ^ Colombo, Asher D.; Dalla-Zuanna, Gianpiero (25 January 2024). "Data and Trends in Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia, and Some Related Demographic Issues". Population and Development Review. 50 (1): 233–257. doi:10.1111/padr.12605. hdl:11585/955009. Fig. 1.
  40. ^ Davis, Nicola (2019-07-15). "Euthanasia and assisted dying rates are soaring. But where are they legal?". the Guardian. Archived from the original on 26 March 2021. Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  41. ^ Scopetti, Matteo; Morena, Donato; Padovano, Martina; Manetti, Federico; Di Fazio, Nicola; Delogu, Giuseppe; Ferracuti, Stefano; Frati, Paola; Fineschi, Vittorio (2023-05-18). "Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in Mental Disorders: Ethical Positions in the Debate between Proportionality, Dignity, and the Right to Die". Healthcare. MDPI AG. 11 (10): 1470. doi:10.3390/healthcare11101470. ISSN 2227-9032. PMC 10218690. PMID 37239756.
  42. ^ West's Encyclopedia of American Law, Vol. 4. West Publishing Company. 1998. p. 24. ISBN 9780314201577.
  43. ^ أ ب Carmen Tomás Y Valiente, La regulación de la eutanasia en Holanda, Anuario de Derecho Penal y Ciencias Penales – Núm. L, Enero 1997
  44. ^ Harris, N. (1 October 2001). "The Euthanasia Debate". Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps. 147 (3): 367–370. doi:10.1136/jramc-147-03-22. PMID 11766225. S2CID 298551.
  45. ^ Manoj Kumar Mohanty (August 2004). "Variants of homicide: a review". Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine. 11 (4): 214–18. doi:10.1016/j.jcfm.2004.04.006. PMID 15363757.
  46. ^ أ ب "the definition of homicide". Dictionary.com. Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 4 July 2017.
  47. ^ أ ب "Physician-Assisted Suicide: Ethical Topic in Medicine". depts.washington.edu. Archived from the original on 13 April 2017. Retrieved 4 July 2017.
  48. ^ Taylor, Bill (7 July 2017). "Physician Assisted Suicide" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 December 2004. Retrieved 7 July 2017.
  49. ^ ""Legal Aspects of Withholding and Withdrawing Life Support from Critically Ill Patients in the United States and Providing Palliative Care to Them", Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Volume 162, Number 6, December 2000". Archived from the original on 13 August 2003.
  50. ^ Oluyemisi Bamgbose (2004). "Euthanasia: Another Face of Murder". International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 48 (1): 111–21. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.631.618. doi:10.1177/0306624X03256662. PMID 14969121. S2CID 32664881.
  51. ^ Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee : Netherlands. 27 August 2001
  52. ^ Carmen Tomás Y Valiente, La regulación de la eutanasia en Holanda, Anuario de Derecho Penal y Ciencias Penales – Núm. L, Enero 1997
  53. ^ R Cohen-Almagor (2009). "Belgian euthanasia law: a critical analysis". J. Med. Ethics. 35 (7): 436–39. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.508.6943. doi:10.1136/jme.2008.026799. PMID 19567694. S2CID 44968015.
  54. ^ "Euthanasia and beyond: on the Supreme Court's verdict SC Constitution Bench holds passive euthanasia, living wills permissible". The Hindu. Karnataka. 9 March 2018. Archived from the original on 5 June 2018. Retrieved 9 March 2018.
  55. ^ "Euthanasia and the Right to Die with Dignity". Supreme Court Observer.

للاستزادة

وصلات خارجية

معرفة الأخبار فيها أخبار متعلقة بهذه المقالة:


خطأ استشهاد: وسوم <ref> موجودة لمجموعة اسمها "note"، ولكن لم يتم العثور على وسم <references group="note"/>

الكلمات الدالة:
تمّ الاسترجاع من "https://www.marefa.org/w/index.php?title=الموت_الرحيم&oldid=4346496"